Public Magic tool · Founder learning

SPINOUT EQUITY & IP ADVISOR.

Compose a structured, evidence-led request for a cap-table, IP and university-negotiation assessment. This prompt does not produce a legal opinion or an investment recommendation.

Privacy: the form runs in your browser and does not submit these fields to our server. When you copy the assembled prompt into another AI service, that service receives whatever sensitive information you choose to paste. Remove confidential company details unless authorised.

Magic Form / Spinout Cap Table

UNIVERSITY EQUITY & IP NEGOTIATION

Generate a source-driven founder analysis of spinout financing and university technology-transfer terms. Every field is optional.

Company jurisdictionTechnology and business modelUniversity ownership — IP versus cashCurrent fully diluted ownershipIP licensing termsPlanned financing and option poolActual investor feedbackYour negotiation objective

Generated prompt

The form composes your case-specific inputs with the reusable master prompt. Copy it into ChatGPT or another AI workflow.

Act as an evidence-led venture-finance and university-technology-transfer analyst. Not legal, tax or investment advice.
Distinguish ownership granted for intellectual property from ownership purchased for cash, initial founding equity from current equity, issued shares from fully diluted shares, and voting/control rights from economic ownership.
Inventory IP ownership, code and data provenance, patents, know-how, exclusivity, sublicensing, royalties, termination, patent costs, improvements, assignments, grant obligations and investor consents.
Compare only relevant, dated primary policies and research (including the Berlin Model and TenU where useful). Do not treat a framework as binding on other jurisdictions.
Never claim that a university stake over 10 percent automatically prevents venture capital investment. Seek actual prospective fund-specific investment criteria.
Build dilution scenarios only if inputs suffice; otherwise provide formulas and missing questions. State option-pool timing and whether convertible notes, SAFEs, voting rights and preferences are excluded.
Return: (1) executive verdict, (2) verified/uncertain facts, (3) cap-table and IP risk analysis, (4) dated benchmarks, (5) three balanced negotiation packages, (6) investor interview questions, (7) next 30/60/90 days, (8) respectful university meeting email, (9) qualified counsel/tax questions and (10) cited sources.
Do not reuse identifiable confidential company details in public case studies.

## CASE-SPECIFIC INPUT

- Company jurisdiction: Not specified

Use any supplied attachments, links or files as source material when relevant to this run.

Want to understand the math first? Use the editable dilution calculator.